For some, these are the people who actually help them, save their hard earned money by giving useful tips bang on time.
For some, these are insane people who take their profession quite literally.
I wont confuse you further, here the community I am talking about is the CRITIC circuit. For a country like INDIA where usually 2-3 movies release every week on an average (Including regional cinema), critics are people who, 95% of the time decide the fate of a movie.
This has been a topic of discussion for long, “whether critics’ ratings play any role in a film’s fate?”. I won’t start a debate over here but would love to highlight a simple point:
*
This one star can prove to be a nightmare for many directors and producers.
*****
A combination of these stars can prove to be a boon.
Critics are doing a great job by reviewing movies for the sake of cinema, for the sake of audiences and also, helping them in choosing the perfect movie for their perfect outing. BRAVO!!
But do they (critics) ever realize how much this trend is backfiring INDIAN CINEMA?
As a matter of fact:
- (One star)--------- Gives an idea to a regular moviegoer that the movie isn’t worth a watch.
CONCLUSION:
People who wanted to see the flick are now told that they shouldn’t.
Saves a lot of the audience’s money, which otherwise would have been a waste.
Though the PRODUCER and the DIRECTOR who worked for years to complete that movie bear losses in Crores.
BUT WHY SHOULD WE CARE??
*****( FIVE STAR RATING) --------Gives an idea that a movie is a must watch.

Now, here is the main concern. A low-star rating can definitely influence one not to go to the cinema hall, but higher ratings do not bear the same results. Else, a movie like FIRAAQ would not have been a flop. A WEDNESDAY would have earned more than 30 – 40 CRORE NET GROSS. (Actual figure being 9.9 crores)!!
But NO!!! It isn’t happening!!!
It’s high time these critics realize that they are part of this industry; if they can’t think well for this industry then no one can. A movie like LADIES TAILOR manages to get more than one star in a few reviews but NO SMOKING barely manages more than one in any review!! We definitely need a check here- “ON WHAT BASIS ARE RATINGS GIVEN??"
Bollywood’s famous critic KHALID MOHAMMED decided the fate of more than hundreds of movies but his own cinema sense could not give him a single hit till date. And he has been continuously delivering duds in the form of FIZA, TEHZEEB, and SILSILAY. Now, CAN he explain, “WHAT CONTENT WAS HE LOOKING FOR IN A MOVIE FOR YEARS?? (For the records, he hardly ever gave more than 2-3 stars to a movie unless it had SHAHRUKH). If these people themselves can’t make a good movie then how they can criticize someone else’s product??
A few CRITICS like RAJA SEN and MAYANK SHEKHAR act as if they were born in AMERICA, not INDIA. As if, they've always seen HOLLYWOOD movies and now, are suddenly exposed to the harsh world of BOLLYWOOD. All they can appreciate from BOLLYWOOD is the so-called PARALLEL OR MEANINGFUL CINEMA.
I don’t say it’s wrong to criticize a movie but its high time critics realize, that this is their own industry for GOD’S sake!! The latest example is the outright rejection of 99. Agreed it’s not the best product to come out of Bollywood, but it definitely isn’t as bad as its made out to be. In such adverse times when BOLLYWOOD is bleeding, even small successes can bring a smile on at least a few faces.
But WHO CARES? All they care about is sticking to their profession, as if FILMFARE has been announcing the Best Critic award to those who grant the lowest star ratings through out the year.
It’s high time we show some maturity, realize and accept the facts, instead of running away from reality. This is our own industry and every effort in a positive direction can bring us laurels and lots of smiles on many faces :)